NGO Joint Statement: Calling for the Provision of the “Cash Handouts to Support Students” to All the Students in Need

May 25, 2020

NGO Joint Statement
Calling for the Provision of the “Cash Handouts to Support Students” to All the Students in Need

On May 19, the Ministry of Education of Japan announced the establishment of the scheme of the Emergency Cash Handouts to Support Students for Their “Continuous Learning”, which aims to grant cash benefits to higher education students who face financial difficulties as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic so that they do not need to give up their education. We welcome the launching of the support for the “continuous learning” of students in need.

First of all, however, the number of eligible students under the scheme is some 430,000, which is very small and represents 10% or so of the students in higher education institutions and Japanese language schools. According to the survey on the students’ living conditions in 2016/17, conducted by the Japan Student Services Organization (JASSO), the proportion of the students who have problems or difficulties in pursuing their education only on the basis of the payment by their families and who receive no financial support from their families amounted to 36.0% in universities (full-time), 42.5% in master’s courses and 53.1% in doctor’s courses. Although approximately half of students in higher education take up part-time jobs to continue their education, many reports on the media show that there has been a sharp reduction in opportunities for students to work part-time, including because of official requests to refrain voluntarily from doing businesses in efforts to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Although the eligibility criteria are linked with the reception of scholarships or the use of student loans (the criteria (6)), it is unreasonable to subject the present scheme to such conditions because it is aimed at supporting those who are facing difficulties because of COVID-19. The Ministry of Education should delete the criteria (6) and provide all students in need with the cash handouts.

Secondly, the scheme establishes additional criteria (7) only for students from overseas, requiring them to rank high in terms of academic performance. The purpose of the cash handouts is, however, to help students stay in educational institutions so that they can be involved in “continuous learning” amidst difficult living conditions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. It is obvious discrimination on the basis of nationality to establish such different criteria only for students from overseas, in spite of the fact that the difficulties they face have nothing to do with their academic performance.

Since the launch of the “300,000 International Student Plan” in 2008, the Government of Japan has maintained the policy to accept students from overseas in a proactive manner. More than 340,000 persons stay in Japan with the “student” visa (as of the end of the year 2019), many of whom work part-time to keep studying in Japan. According to the survey on the living conditions of privately financed international students in 2017/18, conducted by the JASSO, approximately half of their earnings come from part-time jobs, and 75.8% of privately financed international students work part-time. The discriminatory criteria for the cash handouts, announced in this context, illustrate the opportunistic nature of Japan’s policy on students from overseas, which is far from the philosophy of “international contribution”.

According to the media coverage, the Ministry of Education states that “since the eligibility is to be examined by each university or other higher education institution, those students who do not meet the criteria may be eligible for the cash handouts”. If this is the case, there is no need to establish such criteria. We demand that the criteria 1(7) only for students from overseas be deleted and that the same criteria be applied to them on an equal basis with other students.

Thirdly, students who attend educational institutions other than “Article 1 schools” (schools defined in Article 1 of the School Education Act) or Japanese language schools are excluded from the scheme, even though they may also face risks to “continuous learning” as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Japan is one of the States Parties to the Convention on the Rights of the Child, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, all of which require the government to ensure the right to learn for all children living in Japan on an equal footing, without discrimination on the basis of nationality, ethnic origin or other status.

In the autumn in 1998, a Graduate School of Kyoto University allowed a graduate from Korea University (Tokyo), a school in the ‘miscellaneous’ category, to take its entrance examination and admitted the student who passed the exam. The Ministry of Education responded in August of the next year (1999) by amending the Ordinance for the Enforcement of the School Education Act to expand the qualifications for entering graduate schools. Consequently, graduates from Korea University, which is not an Article 1 school but a school in the ‘miscellaneous’ category, as well as graduates from departments in Japan of foreign universities – Japan campus of Temple University (USA), Hakodate campus of Far Eastern Federal University (Russia), Japan campus of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tokyo campus of Beijing Language and Culture University and Tokyo campus of Shanghai University, all of which are not Article 1 schools – are now qualified for entering graduate schools of universities in Japan.

In the light of the international human rights standards as well as the above-mentioned history, students of these schools should also be included in the scheme to support “continuous learning” of those in need. Korea University and some of the departments in Japan of foreign universities have postgraduate courses, which should also be included in the scheme.

On the basis of the above, we strongly demand that the Ministry of Education and the Government of Japan withdraw the criteria (6) and (7) for receiving the cash handouts, with a view to including all students in higher education institutions, including Korea University and departments in Japan of foreign universities, in the scheme to support their “continuous learning”.


Solidarity Network with Migrants Japan (SMJ)
Japan Network towards Human Rights Legislation for Non-Japanese Nationals & Ethnic Minorities
Japan NGO Network for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (ERD Net)
The International Movement Against All Forms of Discrimination and Racism (IMADR)

contact: Solidarity Network with Migrants Japan (SMJ)
Tel: +81-3-3837-2316








しかし、第一に、支給対象者は、高等教育機関および日本語学校に学ぶ学生の1割強にすぎない43万人と非常に少ない。日本学生支援機構(JASSO)の「2016年度 学生生活調査結果」によれば、家庭からの給付のみでは、修学不自由・困難及び給付なしの者が、大学(昼間部)では36.0%、大学院修士課程と博士課程では、それぞれ42.5%と53.1%にも上っている。アルバイトをすることで学業を継続している者が半数前後いるが、新型コロナウイルス感染症拡大による「自粛」要請等により、学生のアルバイトが激減したことは多数報道されている。新型コロナによる困窮にたいする支援である「給付金」を、従来からの奨学金の受給と結びつけるのは不合理であり、給付要件⑥を削除し、困窮するすべての学生を救済すべきである。


日本政府は、2008年に「留学生30万人計画」を掲げて留学生を積極的に受け入れる政策をとってきた。2019年末に「留学」の在留資格をもつ者は34万人を超え、その多くがアルバイトをしながら日本で学んでいる。JASSOの「2017年度 私費外国人留学生生活実態調査」によれば、収入の半数前後をアルバイト収入が占め、私費留学生全体の75.8%がアルバイトに従事している。こうしたなか示された「給付金」の差別的基準は、「国際貢献」とは程遠い日本の留学生政策の利用主義が問われている。








特定非営利活動法人 移住者と連帯する全国ネットワーク(移住連)

移住者と連帯する全国ネットワーク(移住連):TEL 03-3837-2316






「人権白書」2020年版 サンプル(冒頭部) (約1MB)

●2020年版 購入お申込みフォーム(別ウィンドウが開きます)






川崎市ふれあい館等へのヘイトスピーチに対する森雅子法務大臣の発言について ――外国人人権法連絡会の取り組みの経過報告と今後の課題

2020年3月26日 外国人人権法連絡会



1月4日に川崎市ふれあい館に脅迫年賀状が届いてからすでに3か月近く、その間合計7通もの脅迫文書、3月6日には模造刀と木刀がふれあい館に置かれ、在日コリアン、利用者、職員、近隣住民などが日々恐怖にさらされてきた苦しみからすれば、森法務大臣のコメントはあまりに遅いと言わざるをえません 。












●日時:2020年 4月 25日 (土) 14:00~16:30

●会場:文京区スカイホール (東京都文京区春日1-16-21 文京シビックセンター26階)

講演① 安田浩一さん(ジャーナリスト)「外国人差別の実態──これ以上、ヘイトの「更新」を繰り返すな」
講演② 丹羽雅雄さん(大阪弁護士会) 「歴史的・構造的差別と戦後日本の外国人政策」



  1. お名前、所属、連絡先を、info@gjhr.netまでお送りください。
  2. 申込みフォーム